Comparing reference managers
Last updated
Last updated
Zotero is a reference manager. When you use a reference manager, the following tasks are (more or less) a 1-click process:
add/import references
create a bibliography
cite while you write a paper
All these technical tasks should be done by the software, but remember that you are the brain. This means that you should:
read the documents (:wink)
check if the reference data are correct and complete
sort references
select relevant references to add in the bibliography
It is important to understand that this kind of software is made to manage a bibliography, not several items of a same document. It's not suitable to keep track of who borrowed what document (e.g. in the lab collection).
Zotero is user-friendly and powerful. Most ot the recent reference managers chose a similar interface or workflow. Zotero is compatible with a large number of online resources: as of January 2018, more than 500 fully compatible resources (more than any other reference manager). It's free. Not only free of charge, but above all it's a free and open source software (no restriction due to the license agreement). This means that when you will leave EPFL, you will still be able to use it like you did here. Zotero has also a large and active community of users. If you need help, you can quickly get an answer to the issues you face. If you need a feature, its implementation doesn't depend on the developers' willing to do it: you can ask for it (maybe another user already implemented it) or do it by yourself. Zotero is modular: additional features can be added and shared through plugins (https://www.zotero.org/support/plugins).
Finally, and even if it's not covered in this workshop, it's important to know that Zotero is made for collaborative work, more than any other reference manager. This includes unlimited members and unlimited items for an unlimited number of group libraries. There are storage space limitations, though.
All the reasons above explain why we choose to focus on Zotero.
